I don’t feel satisfied at all with the results of the election. To me, there was sufficient enough cheating to warrant a full recount nationwide. How can all of these little things, like more people voting in four Wisconsin precincts than residents that even live there, not trigger massive nationwide alarm bells?
According to local reports, there were four precincts in Hortonville, Cicero, Bear Creek, and Grand Chute, where it was reported that more people had voted in the presidential race, than had voted overall. The discrepancy, which was attributed by local officials to human error, added over 1,000 votes to Donald Drumpf which were then taken away when the official election results were posted.
Source: Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts
And then, BEFORE THE RECOUNT, they further concluded there were more fake votes for Drumpf:
As Wisconsin prepares for an official recount, 5000 fake Drumpf votes have already been subtracted from Drumpf’s lead. Drumpf only won by a total of 27k votes meaning that his lead has already decreased by 18% before the recount has even begun.
Just after the election she said that she had no intention of calling for a recount. But after a recount in Wisconsin was initiated by Green Party candidate Jill Stein, she’s agreed to give it her support. There are also reports that Clinton was given evidence of voter fraud by an independent group of computer scientists, which may have helped to change her mind. The group, working out of the University of Michigan, says that they have strong evidence of voter fraud in the three states mentioned earlier. They have not publicly released the information yet; but whatever it was the Clinton campaign changed their stance on a recount just two days after hearing about it.
Drumpf for one isn’t pleased. Despite having expressed concerns about the integrity of the election himself just prior to the election, he’s now saying that the recount is a ‘scam.’ He famously said that he wouldn’t accept the results of the election if he felt that it was unfair. A statement that he probably wishes he could take back now.
Source: “More Votes Than Voters,” Wisconsin Counties Investigating Massive Voter Fraud (DETAILS) – US Uncut
For some, this is clearly not an aberration; the intent is cheating:
“When you have not one, but four separate precincts reporting that more people voted for president than voted overall, that should not be treated as a clerical error, but rather as a coordinated attempt to commit widespread election fraud,” said Scott Dworkin, Senior Advisor to the Coalition. “The Wisconsin Elections Commission should not look into just these precincts, but into every other precinct in the state where there was a discrepancy,” Dworkin added.
The state should be looking into every vote in every precinct because this level of error is unprecedented. The numbers aren’t adding up in Wisconsin. As more irregularities are found in the totals scrutiny should be increased. Voters deserve to have their questions answered, and the best way to verify the integrity of the nation’s elections is with a full audit and recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Source: Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts
Furthermore, the math in those three states as well as Florida smacks of being fixed: you don’t happen to win every swing state by such a slim margin (<1%). In real math, there are peaks and valleys. The best example was when my high school math teacher made us flip a coin 100 times or fake the results, and he could often guess who actually did the flips, for a run of 10+ heads or tails is more than likely to occur. The point: real math/life is never so clean, you’d win one or two states by like 2%, maybe one close, and lose the other. Looks too perfect to be true…
After the Washington Post reported Russia spread fake anti-Hillary propaganda, I would have thought it would be enough:
The flood of “fake news” this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Drumpf and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.
Russia’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human “trolls,” and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers. The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of international tensions and promote fear of looming hostilities with nuclear-armed Russia.
On Facebook, PropOrNot estimates that stories planted or promoted by the disinformation campaign were viewed more than 213 million times.
“They want to essentially erode faith in the U.S. government or U.S. government interests,” said Clint Watts, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute who along with two other researchers has tracked Russian propaganda since 2014. “This was their standard mode during the Cold War. The problem is that this was hard to do before social media.”
I mean, the timing of all of this was so poor you would almost want to demand a re-vote. I don’t even know what to say. They successfully fucked our election. But this is what the electoral college is for! Because even if the recount (which it may) doesn’t uncover enough total votes to reverse the vote, THEY CAN:
What were 3 tests that the Founding Fathers used to judge the “fitness” of a President?
- Election of a Qualified Person As Hamilton stated [in Federalist Papers 68], the purpose was to ensure that “…the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.”
- Preventing Election of a Demagogue or Charlatan The Founders did not want a person who would play on public fears and temporary passion to hold the office. Hamilton again: “Talent for low intrigue…may alone suffice to elect a man… but it will require other talents and merit to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union.”
- Preventing Election of a President under Foreign Influence The Founders feared attempts by other countries to orchestrate the election of a person under their influence. The Founders believed, as Hamilton put it, that the decentralized, layered electoral college guarded against foreign nations “…raising a creature of their own to the chief magistry” of the United States.
Source: Hamilton Electors
It is not over. We are desperate to rid ourselves of a man who makes us feel like George W. Bush is back in the saddle again. And honestly, he’s ever worse than W, which is truly a statement. We all feel helpless, because America has a chance to truly be unseated as the democracy we all cherish. So much is at stake, not just at home, but abroad, for the sake of not blowing up the entire world.
We need help. We don’t let dictators rule the United States of America.
Young snarf knows his stuff…..our citizens should remember Richard Nixon’s re-election campaign where we refused to believe that the Presidents’ men engaged in spreading lies and kept enemies list of journalists and politicians to purposely discredit them……..Millions of Americans turned their heads and watched a blatant manipulation of the political system for a dishonest result. It took two years to force the truth and Nixon’s indictment. It was the shame of a Nation getting its pants pulled down in front of the World. If we don’t stand up and secure our elections we will be led where all sheep go.